Atualização de julho de 2006
Safety and tolerability of once versus twice daily atomoxetine in adults
with ADHD.
Adler L, Dietrich A, Reimherr FW, Taylor LV, Sutton VK, Bakken R, Allen AJ,
Kelsey D.
School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Apr-Jun;18(2):107-13.
Background. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a disorder characterized
by hyperactivity, impulsiveness, and inattention that affects 4% of adults.
Atomoxetine hydrochloride is an FDA-approved treatment for adult ADHD, but no
studies have clarified whether there are advantages to once versus twice daily
dosing.
Methods. This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study compared safety and
tolerability of 80 mg atomoxetine QD versus 40 mg atomoxetine BID in 218 adults
with ADHD. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory values, vital
signs, weight, electrocardiograms, scores on the Arizona Sexual Experiences
Scale, and efficacy (using the Conners' ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated:
Screening Version) were assessed.
Results. The overall incidence for any one TEAE was low. There was no significant
treatment group difference in likelihood of patients experiencing >/=1 of
the four most commonly observed TEAEs (dry mouth, insomnia, nausea, and erectile
dysfunction). Frequency of nausea was significantly lower in the 40 mg BID group
(16.4%) than the 80 mg QD group (32.4%; p = .007). There were no unexpected
safety results. Although both QD and BID treatments were efficacious, the reduction
in scores was greater for BID treatment.
Conclusions. Data indicate both dosing strategies are safe, well tolerated,
and efficacious in the treatment of adult ADHD. Changes in dosing strategy are
unlikely to be accompanied by safety risks, implying that there is room for
prescribers to use discretion and to base dosing strategies on individual factors.
Subtypes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Distinct
or Related Disorders Across Measurement Levels?
Baeyens D, Roeyers H, Walle JV.
Department of Psychology, Developmental Disorders, Faculty of Psychology and
Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B - 9000, Ghent,
Belgium, Dieter.Baeyens@ugent.be.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2006 Jun 6; [Epub ahead of print]
The aim of this literature review is to assess the current state of knowledge
regarding differences and similarities between the inattentive (IA) and combined
(C) subtypes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in order to
detail challenges concerning further conceptualization, diagnostics, and treatment.
The literature on ADHD-IA and ADHD-C was reviewed and contrasted across genetic,
neuroanatomical, neurophysiological/ neurochemical, neuro(psycho)logical, and
clinical psychiatric measurement levels. It was found that the more fundamental
the measurement level, the less unambiguous evidence is found for subtype differences.
Only on the clinical psychiatric diagnostic level, do more or less clear-cut
differences in cognitive, social, academic, and behavioural functioning emerge.
In conclusion, fundamental research that compares ADHD-IA and ADHD-C is relatively
rare. At this point, only irrefutable phenomenological evidence of subtype differences
seems to be available, even in attention problems which are presumed to be identical.
The question as to whether both subtypes should be considered as two independent
disorders was not adequately resolved.
Gestational age, birthweight and the risk of hyperkinetic disorder.
Linnet KM, Wisborg K, Agerbo E, Secher NJ, Thomsen PH, Henriksen TB.
Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Dept. of Obstetrics and Pediatrics, Aarhus
Hospital, Denmark.
Arch Dis Child. 2006 Jun 5; [Epub ahead of print]
OBJECTIVES: To study the association between gestational age and birthweight
and the risk of clinically verified hyperkinetic disorder. DESIGN: A nested
case-control study with incidence density sampling.
SETTING: Danish longitudinal registers. Patients: 834 cases and 20,100 controls.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Hyperkinetic disorder.
RESULTS: Compared with children born at term, children born with gestational
ages of 34 to 36 completed weeks had a 70% increased risk of hyperkinetic disorder
(rate ratio (RR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.5). Children with gestational
ages below 34 completed weeks had an almost three-fold increased risk (RR 2.7,
95% CI 1.8-4.1). Children born at term with birthweights between 1500 and 2499
grams had a 90% increased risk of hyperkinetic disorder (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.9),
and children with birthweights between 2500 and 2999 grams had a 50% increased
risk (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8) compared with children born at term with birthweights
above 2999 grams. The results were adjusted for socio-economic status of the
parents, family history of psychiatric disorders, conduct disorders, comorbidity,
and maternal smoking during pregnancy. Results related to birthweight were unchanged
after adjusting for differences in gestational age.
CONCLUSIONS: Children born preterm, also close to term, and children born at
term with low birthweights (1500-2499 grams) have an increased risk of clinically
verified hyperkinetic disorder. Our findings have important public health perspectives
because the majority of preterm babies are born close to term.
A package of interventions to reduce school dropout in public schools in a developing
country : A feasibility study.
Graeff-Martins AS, Oswald S, Obst Comassetto J, Kieling C, Rocha Goncalves R,
Rohde LA.
Dept. of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clinicas
de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul,
Brazil, 90035-003.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 6; [Epub ahead of print]
OBJECTIVE: School dropout rates are staggeringly high in developing countries,
even for elementary school children. This study aims to assess the feasibility
and initial efficacy of a package of interventions tailored to reduce school
dropout in public schools in an urban city in Brazil.
METHOD: Two public schools with similar high rates of dropout in elementary
grades were selected. In one of them, a package of universal preventive interventions
was implemented during a school year, including two workshops with teachers,
five informative letters to parents, three meetings with parents at school,
a telephone helpline at school, and a 1-day cognitive intervention. For children
who stayed ten consecutive days out of school without reason, mental health
assessment and referral to mental health services in the community were offered.
In the second school, no intervention was implemented.
RESULTS: After this 1-year intervention, there were significant differences
between the two schools in rates of both dropout (P < 0.001) and absenteeism
in the last trimester (P < 0.05; effect size = 0.64). In the intervention
school, 18 (45%) youths returned to school after intervention among the 40 at-risk
students. Moderate engagement of school staff was the main logistic problem.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that programs combining universal primary
preventive strategies and interventions focused on at-risk students can be implemented
and useful in developing countries to reduce school dropout.
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in girls: epidemiology and
management.
Staller J, Faraone SV.
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA. stallerj@upstate.edu
CNS Drugs. 2006;20(2):107-23.
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in girls is a topic of growing
research and clinical interest. For many years, girls with ADHD have been ignored
and overshadowed by hyperkinetic and impulsive boys, but they are now attracting
interest in an effort to understand the similarities and differences in the
prevalence, symptoms, familial risk, comorbidities and treatment of ADHD in
the two sexes. A review of past and current literature finds that the symptoms
of ADHD are not sex specific, but that identification of girls with ADHD is
hampered by parental and teacher bias, and confusion. Girls are more likely
to be inattentive without being hyperactive or impulsive, compared with boys.
Girls and boys share the same familial risk patterns, as well as similar, although
not identical, comorbidity or impairment patterns. The risk of non-treatment
is as great in girls as it is in boys; up to 70-80% of identified children will
have persistent symptoms and impairment that extends into adolescence and adulthood.
Treatment modalities are equally effective in girls and boys. Stimulants, non-stimulants
and behavioural modalities are the mainstays of effective treatment.
|