Atualização de Abril de 2008
1. Sex differences in the response of children with ADHD to once-daily
formulations of methylphenidate
Sonuga-Barke EJS et al.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007 Jun; 46:701-10.
Compared with boys, girls had better responses to MPH at 1.5 hours and an inferior
response at 12 hours.
The sex of a patient typically does not enter into a clinician’s decision
about the use of a medication. However, ADHD might be a condition in which sex
matters: Compared with boys, girls are more likely to have the inattentive type
of ADHD, coexisting anxiety, more active and efficient clearance of brain dopamine,
and fewer dopamine receptors. To evaluate sex-specific responses to methylphenidate
(MPH) among children with ADHD, investigators reanalyzed data from a randomized,
placebo-controlled, crossover study in 184 children (age, 6–12 years)
with the disorder (26% female; mean age, 9.5). The study compared two forms
of once-daily MPH: Concerta, which provides 12-hour symptom coverage with 22%
immediate release, and Metadate CD, which provides 8-hour symptom coverage with
30% immediate release. MPH dose did not differ for boys and girls.
The only characteristic that differed between sexes was that more girls had
coexisting anxiety disorder. ADHD symptoms were assessed on a standardized scale
by trained observers in a laboratory classroom on day 7 of treatment at 7 time
points during the school day. After controlling for the sex difference in anxiety,
girls had a statistically significant better response to both formulations of
MPH at 1.5 hours and an inferior response at 12 hours, compared with boys.
Comment: Recognition of a sex difference in response to stimulants for children
with ADHD is an important finding. By asking focused questions, pediatricians
can assess behavior responses at specific times of day. Girls with ADHD who
are treated with an extended-release form of MPH might require special attention
for behavior management at the end of the day.
2. Characteristics of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
plus substance use disorder: the role of psychiatric comorbidity.
Wilens TE, Kwon A, Tanguay S, Chase R, Moore H, Faraone SV, Biederman J.
Clinical Research Program in Pediatric Psychopharmacology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Addict. 2005 Jul-Sep; 14(4):319-27.
The objective of the study was to investigate the characteristics of adults
with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) or substance use disorder
(SUD), especially in the context of comorbid psychiatric disorders. Subjects
were adults (n = 78) participating in a controlled family study of ADHD and
SUD. Four groups were identified based on a diagnosis of ADHD or SUD: ADHD,
SUD, ADHD + SUD, and neither ADHD nor SUD. All diagnoses were determined by
structured clinical interview for DSM IV. Rates of psychiatric comorbidity were
lowest in the controls, intermediate in the ADHD and SUD groups, and highest
in the ADHD + SUD group. Relative to controls, the ADHD, SUD, and ADHD + SUD
groups had higher rates of major depression (z = 1.98, p = 0.05), conduct disorder
(z = 2.0, p = 0.04), antisocial personality disorder (z = 2.6, p = 0.009), agoraphobia
(z = 2.5, p = 0.01) and social phobia (z = 2.7, p = 0.007). Higher rates of
psychiatric comorbidity, especially mood and anxiety disorders, exist in subjects
with SUD + ADHD relative to subjects with SUD, ADHD, or controls. Clinicians
need to be attentive to other psychiatric disorders that may occur in the large
group of adults with ADHD + SUD.
3. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- Controlled Study of Modafinil
Film-Coated Tablets in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder
Greenhill LL, Biederman J, Boellner SW, et al
J American Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006; 45:503-511
Previous research has supported the effectiveness of modafinil in treating
children with ADHD. These investigators used a smaller and more easily swallowed
tablet than the one now on the market. They enrolled 200 patients, 73% boys
and mean age 9.9 years, 131 of whom received modafinil; the rest received placebo.
The medication, given once each morning, ranged in dose from 170 mg to 425 mg.
The primary outcome measurement was the ADHD-RS-IV administered to teachers
(School Version) and parents (Home Version) by researchers blind to treatment
condition. They monitored adverse effects by nonspecific inquiry and spontaneous
report, and obtained baseline and follow-up blood count, EKG, chemistries, vital
signs, height, and weight.
Mean treatment duration was 31.5 days for modafinil and 36.4 days for placebo.
Discontinuation for adverse effects occurred in 5% of the modafinil group and
6% of the placebo group. The adverse effects that occurred significantly more
often in the modafinil-treated patients included insomnia, headache, and decreased
appetite. Decreased appetite resolved in 61% of cases during treatment, but
the children taking modafinil lost a mean of 0.6 kg while the children on placebo
gained a mean of 1.3 kg ( P < .0001).
The mean scores on the ADHD-DS-IV School Version of the modafinil group began
improving compared with the placebo group after 1 week of treatment but reached
significance at the end of week 5. The mean scores on the ADHD-DS-IV Home Version
diverged after 1 week, and the difference was significant in that and each subsequent
week until the ninth, when the study ended. The effect size was 0.63 for teacher
ratings and 0.78 for parent ratings.
Viewpoint
This well-designed, short-term study of modafinil confirms its promise as a
treatment for ADHD in children. Modafinil, now in use for treating hypersomnia
in adults, shows efficacy in inattention and hyperactivity and is well tolerated.
It does not, however, seem to be an alternative to stimulants that are devoid
of their most troublesome side effects, including insomnia and appetite suppression,
even with a once-daily morning dose. The long-term tolerability is an important
question that a 1-year, open-label extension of this study, which is underway,
will help answer.
4. Long-Acting Methylphenidate has an Effect on Aggressive Behavior
in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacology. 2007 Aug; 17(4):421-32.
Sinzig J, Döpfner M, Lehmkuhl G; German Methylphenidate Study Group.
Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of Children & Adolescents at
the University of Cologne, Germany.
Introduction: Aggression is frequently observed in children and adolescents
with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The aim of this study
was to assess the efficacy with regard to oppositional and aggressive behavior
of a new long-acting methylphenidate preparation (Medikinet retard (R)), MPH-MR),
with equal portions of the immediate-release and the sustained-release active
substance, and especially to look at correlations between either teacher or
parent assessment of aggression and ADHD sub-symptomatology.
Methods: Eighty five children and adolescents (6-16 years) were investigated
in a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial over 5 weeks under a treatment
with MPH-MR using symptom checklists for ADHD, oppositional-defiant and conduct
disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
4th edition (DSM-IV). Results: A total of 64.9% of the children showed oppositional
defiant disorder/conduct disorder (ODD/CD) symptoms. A statistically significant
effect was found in the group treated with MPH (verum-group). On the basis of
Cohen's criteria, high effects were found for aggressive symptoms in school
(d = 1.0), but not in the afternoon (d = 0.4). There were also lower effect
sizes for more severe aggressive symptoms. We found characteristic correlations
between ODD/CD symptoms and the ADHD subscale hyperactivity/impulsivity compared
to the subscale inattention.
Conclusions: Long-acting MPH is effective in the treatment of oppositional-defiant
and aggressive behavior, especially concerning milder symptoms. The expected
correlation between impulsivity and aggressiveness could be confirmed.
5. Do Formulation Differences Alter Abuse Liability of Methylphenidate?:
A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study in Recreational
Drug Users.
Parasrampuria DA, Schoedel KA, Schuller R, Silber SA, Ciccone PE, Gu J, Sellers
EM.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Oct; 27(5):459-467.
The primary objective of this study was to determine if the abuse liability
of methylphenidate is governed by formulation differences that affect rates
of drug delivery. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover
study, subjects with a history of recreational drug use received single oral
doses of placebo, 60 mg of immediate-release methylphenidate (IR) and 108 mg
of extended-release methylphenidate (osmotic release oral system [OROS]). Over
24 hours after dosing, blood was collected to determine plasma concentrations
of methylphenidate, and subjects completed subjective assessments of abuse liability
(Addiction Research Center Inventory, Drug Rating Questionnaire-Subject, and
Subjective Drug Value).The abuse-related subjective effects of IR and OROS methylphenidate
were statistically significantly different from placebo, confirming the overall
validity of the study. Although a higher dose of OROS methylphenidate was used
compared with IR methylphenidate (108 mg vs 60 mg), subjective effects were
consistently lower for OROS compared with IR methylphenidate (statistically
significant for 3 of 6 measures of positive effects), particularly at early
time points. In general, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters were correlated
from a poor to modest degree, with greater correlations observed for IR methylphenidate.
In addition, a post hoc "qualification" method was developed, which
demonstrated that pharmacological qualification might improve the assessment
of subjective effects. Although requiring epidemiological confirmation, the
results suggest that OROS methylphenidate, with its characteristic slow ascending
plasma concentration profile, may have lower abuse potential. This conclusion
is reflected by lower subjective responses during early hours as compared with
the IR formulation with its rapid drug delivery and accompanying greater subjective
effects.
|